Видео

Clearly explains the battle of forms. Nothing split my head more than this. One quick question: Is the 1o day rejection rule an interpretation of "reasonable time" in the Section 207 (1) and (2)(c) and (6)? The 10 day rejection rule is more concise and precise. What is its source?

Dormant commerce clause was on the Feb 2024 CA bar exam, and thank God I had watched this video because it was the only explanation of the DCC that made sense to me, so thank you!

I'm confused, I do not believe that simply living within the geographic bounds of a state necessarily subject one to the same jurisdiction as a statutory 'resident'.

Thank you so much. You are saving law students from panic attacks !

The 10x10 committed or attempted to comitt murder Roberts - luring and entrapment

why would the plaintiff put up a witness who testifies she saw her (the plaintiff) drinking a beer and run a red light? Did you mean to say the witness saw the defendant drive by drinking a beer and run the red light?

Do you have any course that specialised in product liability?

I was getting a bit caught up on where we need to bring in the specific v general analysis, thanks for clearing that up!

Awesome

Excellent

Just give up. If you don't pass the first time, you a really a disappointment. Just find a window, to deal with the pain.

you are my hero

You made it so easy. I have been trying to understand the Dormant Commerce Clause forever.

Excellent and simple explanation of character evidence.

So useful! Thank you.

Is Model Penal Code tested on the Cal Bar?

It seems like the more the government gets involved in supporting citizens' healthcare, education, finances, etc. and business' finances, hiring practices, etc. the more easily it is to argue the government has a compelling interest in everything.

Love this! Thank you! I'm in Massachusetts, but this applies here too :) 😆

Thank you for the lecture. I have come to really appreciate character evidence

This was the BEST law video explanation I have ever heard/seen. You have yourself a new subscriber and follower here! 🎉Thank you. I am not a law student but have learned it is single most important thing to teach your children these days. It’s dangerous when you and your kids know the law as a civilian. 😮it’s also a great side-hustle to exercise your rights lol. Sorry lawyers!!!!

Currently preparing for my Evidence Exam. This was very helpful to clarify some confusion. Thank you!

thank you, great

Why couldn't my con law professor just say this...

If you failed the bar it’s your own fault and you’re just not good enough 😅

The legend. Why are there only 8 of these?! I need one for every topic! Learn like 3 weeks worth of lecture in 10 minutes. Thanks my guy

Thank you for saving my ass 3 times now

This was amazing! Please please please do a hearsay one!

This was helpful in trial today. This was possibly the only really helpful legal video I've used on RUclips. Thank YOU

Best explanation of character evidence you will find! Thank you for posting this video and sharing your expertise!

Mahalo nui loa! This was extraordinarily helpful.

Absolutely love how you explain everything. ❤

Wow isnt it awesome that we give all our power to government instead of our creator !

Great, thorough explanation.

This guy is good

I finally understood it! thank you :)

This is the best explanation of PJ I’ve ever heard. Succinct.

Best explanation ever

Is Product liability an exclusive realm of Contract law or Tort?

Who's watching in 2024? I don’t really intend to practice this area of the law but Bar Passers can't be choosers. 😅 Thank you, Jay!

What are your thoughts about using unequal protection for cannabis users in states providing protection for doctors, patients, businesses, but none for any unauthorized users where their prosecution continues with mandatory minimum sentences. Federal law currently and clearly defines cannabis as having no known medical use. The doctors recommendation makes the legal exception and thus determines whether a person cultivating or distributing cannabis, or simply in possession of cannabis as criminal activity or acceptable activity within a states borders even though all cannabis activity at the federal level is illegal, especially distribution and cultivation. While prescriptions can be written for synthesized pharmaceutical Cannabinoids it is illegal for natural whole plant medicine. Most Cannabis laws of the past two decades are about protection from the government. The District of Columbia is the has clearest lack of clarity as the individual must be aware whether where they are standing is Federal or District property. It's nothing short of a trap.

Very helpful Thank you

This is the best explanation I’ve seen on this topic. Thank you!

great explanation, much more clear than what is provided in my prep course! thanks a ton

This is out of date. The 2nd Amendment is no longer a “footnote 4” issue and now enjoys a “Text, History, and Tradition” test. There are no tiers of scrutiny that apply to the 2nd Amendment.

this just saved me, thanks a lot!

🌎🙏🙏🙏✝️ 🇺🇸Thank you

Thank you for this lecture- it helped me pass the bar exam July 2023

THANK YOU

I’m currently studying for my bar exam for February 2024 and your videos are beyond helpful. Love your channel and content!

🌎🙏🙏🙏🇺🇸 Attorney rights preliminary hearing rights speedy trial rights. Thank God I have the rights to file a civil rights suit